Lego’s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Lego’s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success

The Danish company has benefitted from being built on a long-term perspective

Many one-product companies run out of road. Small plastic bricks have supported Denmark’s Lego for more than 70 years. A clear focus can pay off. But, amid a debate over the health of public markets, its success also demonstrates the benefits of its distinctive corporate structure.

The toymaker’s sales growth of 2 per cent last year was dragged down by a weak performance in China. But it was respectable enough given a seven per cent decline in toy industry sales. Lego’s sales are not much less than the combined total of its quoted US rivals Mattel and Hasbro. 

Inflation, one cause of the industry’s woes, is subsiding. Low birth rates, another problem, will persist. That is partly offset by adult fans of Lego. This group — known as Afols — creates a market for costly, complicated kits like the Titanic or Eiffel Tower. This “Icons” line made some of the biggest gains of any toy property globally in 2023, according to Circana. 

New products accounted for roughly half of Lego’s portfolio last year. Innovation isn’t without risk: novelty can damage profitability if it means fewer universal pieces that can be produced in high volumes for lots of different kits. The proliferation of parts contributed to Lego’s downturn in 2003, says academic David Robertson. However, the business has since expanded so it can use more parts without hurting the ratio of sales to profits.   

Lego’s operating profit margin fell by 1.7 per cent to 26 per cent, as it spent more on stores, its supply chain and digital operations. Even so, that is nearly three times Hasbro’s adjusted operating figure. Were it quoted, Lego would be worth much more than the $43bn estimate arrived at by using Hasbro’s trailing EV-to-ebitda ratio of 15.5 times.

But Lego is privately held and there is no sign of that changing. Kirkbi, an investment vehicle run by the founding family, owns 75 per cent, with the remainder owned by the Lego Foundation. When an heir opted to sell some Kirkbi shares for $930mn last year, family members took up the slack. Outside investors’ only exposure to the brand is through Legoland-owner Merlin Entertainments. Blackstone and Canadian pension fund CPPIB teamed up with Kirkbi on the £6bn take-private bid in 2019. 

External investors might have been less inclined to tolerate last year’s 10 per cent dividend cut to fund investment. There is evidence that tightly held companies like Lego benefit from a long-term perspective. Building the business, like its product, is an exercise in patience. It can yield impressive results.

[email protected]

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

利奥十四世如何成为特朗普无可奈何的对手

随着他加大对伊朗战争的批评力度,这位教宗的美国背景使他在美国政治中,起到前所未有的作用。

巨额亏损和球迷不满:切尔西私募资本化改革为何陷入困境

在欧洲冠军联赛席位成疑、新球场又迟迟未定之际,人们开始质疑俱乐部所有者将如何实现回报。

一周新闻小测:2026年4月18日

您对本周的全球重大新闻了解如何?来做个小测试吧!

即将到来的全球粮食危机

对伊朗的战争可预见地将引发饥饿,甚至饥荒。如今,全球必须采取行动,保护最贫困的人群免受其影响——这些影响将在战火停息后长期持续。

“光环”交易:一时风潮还是未来所向?

一些评论人士认为,“重资产、低淘汰”的公司,或可成为被AI重创的金融市场的投资解药。

远离校园的孩子

在新冠疫情期间急剧攀升的缺勤率至今仍未回到疫情前水平,相关成本正不断攀升。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×