No BS: using corporate jargon is really giving you away - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

No BS: using corporate jargon is really giving you away

A new study suggests that buying into the blather reveals a credulous worker
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":8.59,"text":"For anyone seeking a definition of corporate bullshit, Microsoft’s Satya Nadella has helpfully produced this distillation. On the topic of AI, he wrote a few months ago: “We need to get beyond the arguments of slop vs sophistication and develop a new equilibrium in terms of our ‘theory of the mind’ that accounts for humans being equipped with these new cognitive amplifier tools as we relate to each other.”  "}],[{"start":35.519999999999996,"text":"This jumble — a classic “word salad” that tosses abstract nouns about — conveys cleverness but means very little."}],[{"start":45.809999999999995,"text":"​Before any Microsoft employee emails to defend their leader, let me suggest that, according to a recent study by Cornell University, if you are swayed by Nadella’s words you might be bad at your job. It found that workers receptive to corporate bullshit (defined as “misleadingly impressive” nonsense, or “noise masquerading as insight”) showed lower levels of analytic thinking and decision-making. ​"}],[{"start":74.53999999999999,"text":"There is some consolation — apparently, they also score highly on job satisfaction and see their boss as “visionary and transformational”. Susceptible, maybe, but also happy."}],[{"start":88.49,"text":"​To reach this conclusion, researcher Shane Littrell created a “corporate bullshit generator” drawing on business quotes and annual reports to come up with empty corporatese, for example: “Working at the intersection of cross-collateralisation and blue-sky thinking, we will actualise a renewed level of cradle-to-grave credentialing.” Here’s another: “By getting our friends in the tent with our best practices, we will pressure test a renewed level of adaptive coherence.”"}],[{"start":119.41999999999999,"text":"​Participants in the experiment (mostly from corporate backgrounds, including human resources, accounting, finance, marketing, and administration) rated the bullshit on a “business-savvy” scale before taking ability tests. And there’s a growing niche for academic research by these so-called bullshitologists. The pioneer was US philosopher Harry Frankfurt, whose 1986 essay declared: “One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit.” Unlike lying, which implies wilful deceit, bullshitters are indifferent to the truth. As Frankfurt puts it, they do “not care whether [they] describe reality correctly”."}],[{"start":161.60999999999999,"text":"No doubt, social media has helped encourage bullshit along with the growth of the armchair expert: these people can express views on the Strait of Hormuz, the economics of restaurant sharing plates, and Matthieu Blazy’s latest collection for Chanel, all within a minute. The danger was reinforced for me the other week when I was invited on to a radio show to discuss a view I’d expressed on Bluesky. I declined, confessing I’d already revealed the sum of my knowledge, approximately 80 words deep. "}],[{"start":196.04,"text":"But LinkedIn’s algorithm seems to reward posts that read like actual nonsense. Little wonder, as business life is a rich seam for bullshit, with roles springing up that are impenetrable to outsiders. The cast of Friends had a go at articulating this when Monica and Rachel tried to describe Chandler Bing’s work. “Something to do with numbers”, before landing on a made-up job title, “transponster”. "}],[{"start":223.89,"text":"The late anthropologist David Graeber’s term “bullshit jobs” chimed with those frustrated by (or in) a growing category of white-collar jobs, whose work is “so completely pointless, unnecessary, or pernicious that even the employee cannot justify its existence”."}],[{"start":244.63,"text":"It is no surprise that ambitious workers encouraged to “fake it till you make it” deploy strings of buzzwords in the hope of career advancement or to deflect attention from shortcomings. After all, the tone is often set from the top, with obfuscating CEOs."}],[{"start":261.98,"text":"To curb its pernicious spread, a previous group of academics recommended a new framework. Comprehend why bullshit exists; Recognise when it is produced; know how to Act against it; and Prevent it from occurring. I won’t spell it out."}],[{"start":287.50000000000006,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1774857491_2245.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

一周新闻小测:2026年7月11日

您对本周的全球重大新闻了解如何?来做个小测试吧!

为何AI有望清理金融“污泥”

监管机构希望在精简繁琐审批程序的努力中利用这项科技。

极端天气风险上升之际,中国严阵以待迎战连续台风

创纪录的暴雨、龙卷风和山体滑坡重创南部地区,洪水还冲出眼镜蛇和动物园里的动物。

希音获中国批准启动久候的IPO

在历经多年拖延后,中国证券监管机构已批准这家快时尚零售商在香港上市。

苹果起诉OpenAI,指控其窃取最高机密信息

这起诉讼标志着两大硅谷巨头关系破裂。

古典学家艾米莉•威尔逊:奥德修斯是另一种类型的骗子

这位备受赞誉的译者为克里斯托弗•诺兰探讨荷马史诗“回响”的新片提供了灵感,也谈到唐纳德•特朗普最像哪一位希腊英雄。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×