So, that was parenthood? - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院
So, that was parenthood?

Expectations, ambushed by reality. Reflections on 18 years of raising children

00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.55,"text":"It feels as if they were only born half an hour ago, but my enormous twin sons are now 17 and preparing (I hope) for the French end-of-school exams, “le bac”. Come September, they should follow their sister to university in the UK, leaving my wife and me in an empty nest in Paris. "}],[{"start":23.150000000000002,"text":"While you’re in the thick of parenthood, it seems eternal. Family life is repetition: the nappies, bedtime stories, football games and thousands of dinners. But as Nicholas Lemann wrote, it’s only a “(long) season of life”, and for us it’s ending. I remember what our cohort of new parents expected from parenthood 20 years ago, when my daughter was born. Instead we were ambushed by reality, which took on forms we hadn’t imagined."}],[{"start":51.05,"text":"My parenting peers in the early 2000s were mostly educated urbanites (commenters, please fill in own epithet), who thought we could shape our children through our individual decisions about parenting. The cohort’s chief metric — inevitably a point of unspoken competition — was hours spent doing childcare. The dominant ambition was to speed children up the educational ladder, teaching them to read aged three, etc. Looking back at that era, just before the financial crisis, there was still a frank admiration for success. People badly wanted their kids to make it. "}],[{"start":86.05,"text":"The first big thing to hit us unawares was the smartphone. I bought one in 2009. A year later, Apple launched the iPad. Suddenly we were dealing with a question we’d never considered: were screens bad for children? Who knew, back then? "}],[{"start":104.4,"text":"I hope I was never obsessed with my children’s achievements, but in any case, our parenting goals changed in 2011 when my wife was diagnosed with cancer. “What are the chances?” we asked the specialist. She did the calculations in front of us. “About 50-50,” she concluded."}],[{"start":123.85000000000001,"text":"My wife and I walked out through the hospital’s medieval courtyard. “Do you think I’ll be OK?” she asked me. I took in her emaciated body, thought, “You’re definitely going to die,” and mumbled some lie. Then she made me tell her my plans for raising the kids if she died."}],[{"start":141.95000000000002,"text":"She didn’t die. Modern medicine is amazing. But from then on, our ambition became simple: both of us staying alive until the boys turned 18. At the time it seemed a daunting goal."}],[{"start":154.60000000000002,"text":"Meanwhile, around the world, beyond our control, childhood was changing. Social media replaced time spent reading and socialising. I don’t blame the kids. If I’d had a smartphone aged 14, I would never have read a book. But collectively, it’s been an educational disaster. "}],[{"start":172.05,"text":"As the educator Michael Strong says (on social media, of course): “If your child becomes a reader, about 80 per cent of the education job is already done . . . Reading is the meta-skill that enables all other skills. History requires reading. Science requires reading. Even math increasingly requires reading.”"}],[{"start":191.15,"text":"Probably linked to social media, but for reasons nobody fully understands, our children’s generation in developed countries experienced a mental-health crisis. We heard stories around us of kids contemplating suicide."}],[{"start":204.85,"text":"Meanwhile, faith in meritocracy was crumbling. The best route into the elite these days seems to be to have parents in the elite. And when I look at most people who reached the top, in business or politics or the Epstein files, I don’t particularly want that for my kids. (Sceptics will dismiss this as carping from someone who didn’t win the glittering prizes, and they may be right.)"}],[{"start":229.35,"text":"I’ve also learnt how little control parents have over children. Looking back 20 years, we underestimated the power of society. We’ve since discovered that collective choices usually trump individual ones. My wife and I didn’t want to give our kids smartphones at 12, but since most socialising and information exchange happened on WhatsApp, we did. If their screen addictions remain modest today, it’s mostly because they grew up in a walkable city with superb public transport. From age 10, they could go out alone to meet friends. If we’d lived in a suburb where they’d needed us to drive them around, they might have spent childhood in their bedrooms on the phone."}],[{"start":267.7,"text":"New parents today are prepared for phones. They learnt from the mistakes of our guinea pig generation. A growing global movement is banning kids from social media, and phones from schools. What is catching today’s parents unawares is AI. "}],[{"start":281.59999999999997,"text":"My ambitions for my children have simplified over time. Now I’d just like them to be happy, sociable, productive members of society, doing enjoyable jobs, and living mostly off-screen. It’s a big ask, but I think they might get there. "}],[{"start":298.09999999999997,"text":"Find out about our latest stories first — follow FT Weekend Magazine on X and FT Weekend on Instagram"}],[{"start":309.5,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1778938327_3780.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

马克•扎克伯格是不是太贪心?让股东来决定

如果这位亿万富翁创始人在意人们的看法,就应该说服其他投资者支持他的愿景。

AI监管不能照搬银行业模式

金融监管体系历经一个世纪的拼凑修补才逐渐成形。AI需要一套针对自身特点设计的监管机制。

FT社评:星链风波凸显欧洲亟须在太空领域迎头赶上

美国科技遥遥领先,但布鲁塞尔仍需建立自己的卫星网络并具备发射能力。

新加坡寻求追究相关公司责任,应对十年来最严重空气污染

政府威胁将对10家企业采取法律行动,称这些企业是邻国印尼山火的幕后推手,而山火造成的烟霾正在困扰新加坡。

美债收益率冲击下,欧洲必须自寻出路

埃里安:欧洲不能只盼着大西洋彼岸的借贷成本回落,它必须着手解决自身问题。

AI与通胀:央行行长该担忧到什么程度?

凯恩斯:这取决于一个价值万亿美元问题的答案:AI是否真能带来预期的生产力提升?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×