US and Iran: the art of the possible - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
战争

US and Iran: the art of the possible

Stopgap agreement leaves key issues to be decided in later talks
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.8,"text":"After weeks of tortuous back-channel talks set against belligerent rhetoric, the US and Iran seem to be edging towards an agreement to extend a fragile ceasefire by 60 days, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and lay the foundations, potentially, for a more comprehensive deal. "}],[{"start":24.900000000000002,"text":"The diplomatic push is tenuous. President Donald Trump said on Saturday the deal had “largely been negotiated” and would “be announced shortly”. The world is still waiting. US strikes on Iranian missile launchers and ships overnight on Monday underlined the fragility. The talks, however, have continued. "}],[{"start":44.55,"text":"An agreement would not guarantee a permanent end to the war. But it would reduce the risks of a full-blown resumption of the conflict. Reopening the strait would begin to ease the worst energy crisis in decades and reduce global recession risks."}],[{"start":58.8,"text":"Will it be a good deal? It depends on the options. As things stand, there are no better options after a US-Israeli attack that should have never have taken place. The alternatives would be to maintain the status quo, a dirty ceasefire with the strait all but closed; to resume strikes on Iran, which is likely to deepen the quagmire and trigger more Iranian retaliation against Gulf states; or for Trump to declare “victory” and wash his hands of the crisis he ignited."}],[{"start":86.15,"text":"Hawkish Republicans have predictably criticised the deal. Yet it was the hawks’ beating of the war drums (along with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s arguments) that helped encourage Trump to plunge the world into this mess. The US president, and Netanyahu, from the outset lacked a coherent strategy and underestimated their enemy. Trump seemed surprised that Iran lashed out against the US’s Gulf allies and was able to hold the strait hostage. Now Tehran has newfound leverage that threatens to harden its stance at the negotiating table. "}],[{"start":118.60000000000001,"text":"Iran, too, needs a deal after weeks of bombardment. The Islamic regime has defied those who considered it a paper tiger. It is still standing and even more hardline, still displaying an ability to strike US bases and Gulf energy infrastructure with precision. It has, however, endured devastating blows, including the loss of its veteran supreme leader Ali Khamenei and top defence and military officials. Its infrastructure has been battered, including steel and petrochemical plants that were a vital source of revenue and jobs. The regime, already decaying and bereft of legitimacy, must begin reconstruction knowing its key test is yet to come at home. "}],[{"start":158.75,"text":"Critical questions remain over the future status of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear programme, already set back by US-Israeli strikes. Under the proposed agreement, Tehran would not charge ships a fee for the duration of the 60-day period. There is a commitment to discuss Iran either diluting or handing over its stockpile of uranium enriched close to weapons grade. The regime would also commit to never developing a nuclear weapon. If it makes concessions, there is the promise of phased sanctions relief and unfreezing of assets held overseas. But that would depend on the progress of talks towards a final comprehensive deal. "}],[{"start":197.3,"text":"There will be unfinished business. Critical issues including Iran’s missile and drone arsenal are left for another time. In essence, regional powers will be left to discuss their security concerns and the future management of the strait with Iran. There is also a danger that this deal, like Trump’s plan to end the war, stagnates in its initial phase."}],[{"start":217.4,"text":"The deal, if agreed, is no panacea for the root causes of a crisis that has festered for decades. But it was never going to be after Trump took the fateful decision to ditch diplomacy and go to war. What it does offer is the art of the possible, a chance to end the escalatory cycle. That, for now, is the least worst option."}],[{"start":245.4,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1779859094_6204.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

马克•扎克伯格是不是太贪心?让股东来决定

如果这位亿万富翁创始人在意人们的看法,就应该说服其他投资者支持他的愿景。

AI监管不能照搬银行业模式

金融监管体系历经一个世纪的拼凑修补才逐渐成形。AI需要一套针对自身特点设计的监管机制。

FT社评:星链风波凸显欧洲亟须在太空领域迎头赶上

美国科技遥遥领先,但布鲁塞尔仍需建立自己的卫星网络并具备发射能力。

新加坡寻求追究相关公司责任,应对十年来最严重空气污染

政府威胁将对10家企业采取法律行动,称这些企业是邻国印尼山火的幕后推手,而山火造成的烟霾正在困扰新加坡。

美债收益率冲击下,欧洲必须自寻出路

埃里安:欧洲不能只盼着大西洋彼岸的借贷成本回落,它必须着手解决自身问题。

AI与通胀:央行行长该担忧到什么程度?

凯恩斯:这取决于一个价值万亿美元问题的答案:AI是否真能带来预期的生产力提升?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×