What is Jane Street? - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

What is Jane Street?

The question is more important than the answer
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.5,"text":"Is it a hedge fund or a proprietary trading firm?"}],[{"start":7.9,"text":"A small but pedantic quarter of the finance internet has been discussing a question raised by Rupak Ghose on his Substack last week — Is Jane Street a prop trading firm, or a hedge fund? Was the hit it took during the Situational Awareness liquidation week the biggest trading loss in history, or just a medium-size fluctuation in AuM of the sort that happens from time to time?"}],[{"start":31.049999999999997,"text":"One way to answer the question might be by means of a sandwich chart:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":35.5,"text":"This feels unsatisfactory, though — the question deserves a deeper answer, as proprietary trading is in many ways more complicated and sophisticated than sandwiches. The definitive answer, as it is with so many of these kinds of questions (like “Are stablecoins banks?”) should really be something like “nobody who matters is confused about what it actually does, so why waste time on semantics”. "}],[{"start":58.6,"text":"But as with most semantic debates, although the answer is almost always kind of unsatisfying, the process can be important. "}],[{"start":65.95,"text":"That’s because people do think about prop trading firms in a different way from hedge funds (and stablecoins in a different way from banks), and identifying the criteria which define one against another can sharpen up your intuitions about what might actually be important to know about a firm like Jane Street."}],[{"start":84,"text":"Is it an open-ended fund structure? An extremely significant taxonomical principle for financial institutions is “those that are subject to something like bank runs” versus “those which aren’t”. If something faces liquidity risk, then it can be a source of contagion; a loss of confidence can force it into behaviour which would otherwise be economically irrational, and which potentially causes trouble for other market players."}],[{"start":110.35,"text":"Where does it get its leverage from? This question is related to the previous one, because there are two ways to be subject to liquidity risk — open-ended liability structures, and short-term borrowing. Hedge funds usually get their leverage through collateralised margin loans subject to immediate calls; prop trading firms generally try to only leverage up on longer-term debt, precisely so that they can’t be squeezed out of positions."}],[{"start":136,"text":"Does it close positions overnight? Most of the very most horrible things that can happen to an investment portfolio happen while the market is closed. There is a very big difference between risks which you can trade out of, and risks that you can’t."}],[{"start":151.35,"text":"And finally, does it earn a compound return? This is probably the most important one, because it determines whether it’s going to grow over time or not. Prop trading firms might have very high returns on capital, but that capital has to be distributed to the owners and shareholders rather than reinvested. If something is capable of compounding, then it’s doing something quite different from the historic prop trading model, which was limited to the size of its market niche."}],[{"start":176.85,"text":"These questions, particularly the last one, focus on the potential risks posed by the two kinds of firms to the rest of the market. Prop trading firms usually get a fairly light touch from regulators and are often treated by incumbent banks as useful counterparties rather than an existential threat, even when they take very large market share. "}],[{"start":197.35,"text":"A large part of the reason for this is that the prop shop business model, in its traditional form, is intrinsically limited in its ability to do damage to the system as a whole. That’s the important thing to focus on when looking at entities like Jane Street — if, heaven forbid, they blew up, what would they take with them?"}],[{"start":216.65,"text":"Further reading:"}],[{"start":218.20000000000002,"text":"— Hedge funds and high-frequency traders are converging (FTAV)"}],[{"start":228.50000000000003,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1787324018_4604.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美债收益率冲击下,欧洲必须自寻出路

埃里安:欧洲不能只盼着大西洋彼岸的借贷成本回落,它必须着手解决自身问题。

AI与通胀:央行行长该担忧到什么程度?

凯恩斯:这取决于一个价值万亿美元问题的答案:AI是否真能带来预期的生产力提升?

印度企业界的乐观情绪站得住脚吗?

印度企业界公开表达的乐观情绪,与家庭和投资者的焦虑情绪之间的落差日益明显。

Lex专栏:中国药企在药品开发领域获得一席之地

外国制药集团如今开始购买中国本土开发创新药物的授权。

特斯拉与太空探索技术公司:以马斯克为中心的庞大企业星系

埃隆•马斯克旗下上市公司的合并有一定道理,但其他股东最终可能不如现在有影响力。

火箭、机器人和风险:马斯克的3.6万亿美元豪赌

全球首富试图促成迄今最大胆的一笔合并交易,但他还需要说服股东和全球监管机构。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×