Fixing the AI industry’s PR problem - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Fixing the AI industry’s PR problem

Doomers will say it’s hopeless but here are five ideas to put out the fire
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.54,"text":"The public reputation of the big AI companies is an absolute dumpster fire. According to Gallup, 9 per cent of Americans think AI will do more good than harm, versus 39 per cent who take the opposite view. To see how that translates to feelings about OpenAI or Anthropic, try talking to, oh, anyone who doesn’t own a stake in one or the other."}],[{"start":27.18,"text":"What can the companies do to regain trust? What is the right PR strategy for AI? Doomers will say it’s hopeless. There is no way to put lipstick on a pig of a technology that will make a few people rich while draining the livelihoods, privacy, freedom and natural resources of the many. For the utopians, productivity and abundance will soothe all fears in a year or two. I don’t know where I am on that spectrum, but I have been talking with a lot of PR professionals lately, and have been thinking about corporate reputation for years. Here, then, are five ideas for the industry, if it wants to put out the fire."}],[{"start":63.46,"text":"Start with the basics. Be companies, not cults. Enterprises that are worth almost a trillion dollars cannot operate like founder-led start-ups. They need to be institutions where the top job goes to whoever can do it best, under the supervision of a serious board and accountable to investors. OpenAI and Anthropic, in other words, cannot afford to be identified with Sam Altman and Dario Amodei in the way that Meta is identified with Mark Zuckerberg or SpaceX is identified with Elon Musk. The public has to know that the boss is just a person, one who can be sacked if things go wrong. In the meantime, Altman and Amodei need to knock it off with the essays and manifestos. They’re creepy, and the company’s work needs to speak for itself."}],[{"start":107.5,"text":"Hand in hand with this, don’t think you can pull a Travis Kalanick. Uber’s co-founder drove an (app-hailed) tank through the objections of regulators and taxi drivers, betting that happy riders would form a pro-Uber constituency that would carry the day eventually. It worked. But AI is much, much bigger than ride-hailing. Many people’s professional lives are going to be rearranged by force (it’s already happening), and there will be a lot more of them than there ever were taxi drivers."}],[{"start":137.62,"text":"Meanwhile, know that your reputation for both character and competence is under threat. I borrow the distinction from Rupert Younger of the Oxford University Centre for Corporate Reputation. He points out that a poor reputation for character is a relatively quick fix, usually involving getting rid of senior leadership (see above). But when a company gains a reputation for incompetence, it’s a long way back. When an experimental OpenAI model recently escaped its sandbox, accessed the internet and broke into another company’s servers, OpenAI said it took its responsibility to prepare for such incidents “seriously” but described the incident as a technology or industry problem — not an OpenAI problem. The incident was “something we expect to become more commonplace”, and “evidence that, without proper safeguards, highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls”."}],[{"start":189.06,"text":"Next time, instead of generalities, Altman could say this: “We have zero tolerance for our models breaking the law, autonomously or not, and all of our team members — myself included — will be held accountable for seeing that this does not happen again.” If you can’t say something like that, then either (a) you have made a technology you can’t control, in which case you are bad at your job or (b) you like that it is out of control, in which case you are a bad person. Competence and character."}],[{"start":216.22,"text":"Be assured that your foundation/think-tank is worse than useless as a PR strategy. Hiring economists and philosophers to study how AI can be used for good may ultimately expand the horizons of knowledge. But given how low trust has fallen, everyone will suspect your foundation is a sales front or an effort to control the regulatory agenda. What the public needs is not white papers. It is to see you doing good: projects where your workers help families and small businesses prosper. Build something that changes the world now."}],[{"start":250.62,"text":"That is a specific instance of a general point: stop talking so much about the distant future. That is the timescale that Silicon Valley prefers. Back here on Earth, we are trying to get to Christmas. No one cares about a productivity boom that may take a couple of years to arrive. Focus your PR efforts on what is happening today."}],[{"start":270.66,"text":"Will AI companies take this, or any other advice? Not while their valuations are still screaming higher. Money confirms all strategies, even bad ones. But reputation always matters eventually."}],[{"start":285.98,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1788423395_2789.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

AI与通胀:央行行长该担忧到什么程度?

这取决于一个价值万亿美元问题的答案:AI是否真能带来预期的生产力提升?

印度企业界的乐观情绪站得住脚吗?

印度企业界公开表达的乐观情绪,与家庭和投资者的焦虑情绪之间的落差日益明显。

Lex专栏:中国药企在药品开发领域获得一席之地

外国制药集团如今开始购买中国本土开发创新药物的授权。

特斯拉与太空探索技术公司:以马斯克为中心的庞大企业星系

埃隆•马斯克旗下上市公司的合并有一定道理,但其他股东最终可能不如现在有影响力。

火箭、机器人和风险:马斯克的3.6万亿美元豪赌

全球首富试图促成迄今最大胆的一笔合并交易,但他还需要说服股东和全球监管机构。

埃博拉疫情扩散至西非,世卫组织发布警报

尼日利亚当局正紧急追踪一名本迪布焦型埃博拉病毒检测呈阳性者的数十名密切接触者。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×