Bidenomics wasn’t ambitious enough - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
气候变化

Bidenomics wasn’t ambitious enough

Rapid decarbonisation will require an overhaul of local energy authorities and better macroeconomic planning
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.09,"text":"The writer is US programme director of Common Wealth, a think-tank"}],[{"start":11.629999999999999,"text":"The Trump administration has functionally repealed former president Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. This is not only an immediate blow to US emissions reductions and global Paris agreement targets. It has collapsed the political economic project of the Biden era: building a new pro-green growth agenda with an industrial policy that sought to de-risk climate investment and a fiscal policy aimed at promoting fuller employment."}],[{"start":42.22,"text":"The lesson to take from this is that the Green New Deal movement was right to advocate for a far more ambitious political economy of comprehensive decarbonisation and the guarantee of fundamental economic rights through public provisioning of universal healthcare, housing, education and dignity for all workers."}],[{"start":66.36,"text":"Progressive policymakers will not have another chance to attempt a grand programme of decarbonisation until the end of President Donald Trump’s second term. And they will only have a chance to do so if they can lay the groundwork now by setting an ambitious agenda and defining the political economic project of the post-Trump era."}],[{"start":89.09,"text":"In the future, the US must deliver even more aggressive decarbonisation. This means envisioning a new era of green economic planning: direct public investment, co-ordination and provisioning in key sectors including but not limited to energy and electricity. This is necessary not only for the energy transition, but to ensure universal high quality and affordable provision of life’s essentials, and to maintain macroeconomic stability through an economy-wide restructuring process."}],[{"start":126.78,"text":"The green boom was not technically adequate to deliver decarbonisation. IRA subsidies attempted to bribe generalised private green investment. They were stymied by supply chain snarls, interest rate increases and under-investment in the privately-controlled electricity transmission system."}],[{"start":148.33,"text":"Instead of reviving the IRA’s clean energy tax credits, the US should redesign its power sector by building publicly owned energy infrastructure. As climate writer Robinson Meyer recently noted, it is already clear in the face of electricity inflation that states with publicly owned power authorities such as the New York Power Authority “are able to intervene more forcefully in their own power markets than states that lack such capability . . . because the state itself can act to build its own large-scale power plants”. Their dramatic expansion should be the centrepiece of future power sector policy."}],[{"start":187.88,"text":"Planning is also the prism through which to pursue building progressive macroeconomic policy and decarbonisation governance frameworks. The Biden administration was right to use fiscal spending to pursue a strong labour market recovery post-Covid. But, the experience of supply-side-induced inflation has demonstrated the political limits of uncoordinated growth."}],[{"start":216.32999999999998,"text":"The solution is to co-ordinate growth and economic restructuring to prevent price instability, whether from real bottlenecks or what economist Isabella Weber has called “sellers’ inflation”. The US must build a stronger national macroeconomic planning apparatus from the revival of the Office of Price Administration to a National Investment Authority and a National Economic Planning Board to co-ordinate investment and govern prices."}],[{"start":248.07,"text":"The Green New Deal movement argued that change would not come from a single piece of legislation, but a decade of political contestation. The era of Bidenomics may be over but the fight must continue under Trump. With a president hostile to decarbonisation in the White House, now is the time to shape a future green economic agenda that can protect the environment and guarantee economic security for working people."}],[{"start":283.85999999999996,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1756260645_4134.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

莫迪希望夺取苹果印度生产基地的掌控权

泰米尔纳德邦已成为制造业强省,但莫迪领导的印度人民党迄今难以在这片土地上取得进展。

Lex专栏:标普500指数回升,但战争阴云仍笼罩股市

增长预期上升却未带动估值攀升,说明投资者对未来更加谨慎。

伊朗战争推高化肥成本,美国农民雪上加霜

美国农业部门本已因特朗普贸易战而深受打击,这场冲突又推高了化肥成本。

宾州芯片制造业振兴计划在特朗普任内陷入停滞

高科技半导体制造业发端于利哈伊山谷,但承诺用于其复兴的联邦资金迟迟未能到位。

苹果下一任掌门人特努斯面临决定性的AI时刻

库克的继任者必须带领这家iPhone制造商渡过产业转型。

乌克兰无人机飞行员在500公里外打击俄罗斯目标

基于互联网的新型引导系统使乌克兰无人机操作员能够在远离战场的区域执行任务。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×