There was nothing here to save Starmer - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 英国政治

There was nothing here to save Starmer

Voters need hope, but so do his MPs — and he did not give them any
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.95,"text":"There are precious few speeches in political history that fundamentally alter the landscape. Sir Keir Starmer’s on Monday morning will not be one of them."}],[{"start":14.05,"text":"It wasn’t a bad speech, though Starmer might have made it at any time in the past few years. But it was not one that changed the argument over whether he should be ousted as prime minister. Those who are demanding a “change of direction” or hoping for a glimpse of a different leader will not have found it. "}],[{"start":30.35,"text":"He tried. There would be a change of pace, a redoubling of commitments, Labour would go further, it would go faster. It would speak for the needs of the people who rely on it. There were even a couple of nuggets to cheer his MPs, not least the commitment to renationalising what remains of British Steel. On Europe, Starmer promised much more effort to put the UK back in Europe’s heart but stopped short of rejoining the institutions that would actually do that. "}],[{"start":58.150000000000006,"text":"So those looking for some real red meat will not have found it. Voters need hope, he declared, but so do his MPs and he did not give them any. The best reason for Starmer to stay — that the country simply does not need this now — is not being heard by MPs whose current focus is on the party. "}],[{"start":78.80000000000001,"text":"He was right in one way, when he argued that Labour cannot win as a weaker version of Reform UK or the Greens but only as a stronger version of Labour. Yet the fundamental problem for Labour and Starmer is that voters are not listening to him and therefore it. In many of the areas lost to Reform last week, there is a serious danger that voters have now lost the habit of voting Labour. "}],[{"start":101.55000000000001,"text":"Those who might yet be open to returning to the fold will need permission to give Labour another glance. A change of leader would offer that permission, though it might prove a fleeting respite given that nothing will change the economic fundamentals of the UK and some contenders alarm the bond markets. “Things Can Only Get Better” was a campaign song, not a forecast. "}],[{"start":123.30000000000001,"text":"And yet what is also clear is that many, many Labour MPs are nervous about stepping over the edge into a leadership challenge. They are not sure who will win. Those who want to see Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, in the role need to give him time to find a path back into parliament. So what might delay Starmer’s departure is that raft of MPs who are sure he has to go but not convinced it has to be this week. "}],[{"start":149.35000000000002,"text":"What won’t save him is this speech, or his comment at the weekend that he wants to go on for 10 years, or the decision to bring back Gordon Brown or Harriet Harman as advisers. Those moves probably made things worse, showing the paucity of strategy. "}],[{"start":165.65000000000003,"text":"The one note of substance was the clear indication that Starmer has no intention of making it easy for his opponents. He will not lightly step aside. That could buy him more time, or it could force one of his would-be successors into action. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has the least to gain from waiting. "}],[{"start":183.95000000000005,"text":"There are good reasons for Labour not to act now. There is no real hurry. The next election is up to three years away. None of the mooted alternatives has offered reason to think they have a serious plan for the country and most are likely to move in a direction of higher taxes, more regulation and more state interference. "}],[{"start":201.05000000000004,"text":"But events may simply have moved too far. What Starmer’s speech showed is that there is probably nothing he can do to save himself beyond refusing to crumble. His best bet now is that he has shown more grit than those who want him out."}],[{"start":215.85000000000005,"text":"The basic calculations still hold. Starmer’s tenure is ebbing away. Britain is heading into another zombie premiership. The blow could fall today, tomorrow, next week or next month. MPs are just weighing the odds and timings they need to get their people in place. The decision is made. It is now only about logistics. "}],[{"start":241.15000000000006,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1778549220_6951.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

马克•扎克伯格是不是太贪心?让股东来决定

如果这位亿万富翁创始人在意人们的看法,就应该说服其他投资者支持他的愿景。

AI监管不能照搬银行业模式

金融监管体系历经一个世纪的拼凑修补才逐渐成形。AI需要一套针对自身特点设计的监管机制。

FT社评:星链风波凸显欧洲亟须在太空领域迎头赶上

美国科技遥遥领先,但布鲁塞尔仍需建立自己的卫星网络并具备发射能力。

新加坡寻求追究相关公司责任,应对十年来最严重空气污染

政府威胁将对10家企业采取法律行动,称这些企业是邻国印尼山火的幕后推手,而山火造成的烟霾正在困扰新加坡。

美债收益率冲击下,欧洲必须自寻出路

埃里安:欧洲不能只盼着大西洋彼岸的借贷成本回落,它必须着手解决自身问题。

AI与通胀:央行行长该担忧到什么程度?

凯恩斯:这取决于一个价值万亿美元问题的答案:AI是否真能带来预期的生产力提升?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×