Supreme Court reminds America (and Trump) what citizenship is - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 美国

Supreme Court reminds America (and Trump) what citizenship is

The United States has always been based on the notion of welcoming newcomers from every country
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.75,"text":"Good news for American soccer fans. Folarin Balogun, one of the breakout stars of this year’s World Cup team, is still a US citizen courtesy of a landmark Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday that swatted down President Donald Trump’s attack on birthright citizenship."}],[{"start":22,"text":"Balogun, who was born in Brooklyn to Nigerian parents who were temporarily visiting from London, is as much a citizen as the direct descendants of the country’s founding fathers, the court held."}],[{"start":32.85,"text":"Chief Justice John Roberts’ closely watched opinion is a welcome — and overdue — defence of an inclusive definition of what it means to be an American, even as the country gears up to celebrate its 250th birthday. "}],[{"start":45.85,"text":"The court ruled 6-3 that Trump’s executive order denying citizenship to the US-born children of undocumented migrants was illegal. A smaller 5-4 majority held that the principle that children born on American soil are citizens was enshrined in the country’s constitution in the 1860s."}],[{"start":65.45,"text":"“Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights — to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the 14th Amendment extended that promise to ‘every freeborn person in this land’. We keep that promise today,” Roberts wrote."}],[{"start":80.75,"text":"Founded by religious pilgrims, adventurers and debtors all seeking a fresh start, the United States has always been based on the notion of welcoming newcomers from every country. The country’s decennial census did not even start asking where people had been born until 1850."}],[{"start":98.25,"text":"As Roberts writes in his opinion, Americans initially assumed that citizenship depended on where you were born unless you took steps to alter it. That changed in 1857 when the Supreme Court issued what is widely considered the worst decision in its history, Dred Scott, and helped provoke the Civil War. "}],[{"start":117.9,"text":"After anti-slavery forces in the North won, the 14th Amendment reinstated the principle that soil, rather than blood, determined citizenship. But as immigration shot up at the end of the 19th century, so too did efforts to question the Americanness of the children born to unfamiliar arrivals. In 1898 a wise Supreme Court reinforced the promise of the American welcome by ruling that birthright citizenship also applied to a child of Chinese immigrants."}],[{"start":147.1,"text":"There matters stood for more than a century, as generations of immigrants, including two sets of my great-grandparents, set sail for America hoping for a better life. They never questioned whether their offspring would truly belong, even after Congress clamped down hard on immigration from Asia and southern and eastern Europe in the 1920s. "}],[{"start":166.6,"text":"The current attacks on birthright citizenship coincide with the return of mass immigration. Nearly 15 per cent of US residents are foreign-born, the highest share since 1890, and more than one in four US children has at least one immigrant parent."}],[{"start":183.54999999999998,"text":"Today the Supreme Court has rightly held the line, but the five-justice constitutional bulwark against xenophobia is a very thin one. "}],[{"start":192.29999999999998,"text":"At a time when many Americans are pessimistic about their own future and that of their country, it is easy to fear newcomers. What the US needs are regular reminders that immigration makes the country stronger rather than sapping its prosperity."}],[{"start":206.35,"text":"So here’s to the US men’s World Cup squad — more than half its members are dual citizens and six were born outside the country. Long may its run continue."}],[{"start":224.35,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1782880985_3690.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美债收益率冲击下,欧洲必须自寻出路

埃里安:欧洲不能只盼着大西洋彼岸的借贷成本回落,它必须着手解决自身问题。

AI与通胀:央行行长该担忧到什么程度?

凯恩斯:这取决于一个价值万亿美元问题的答案:AI是否真能带来预期的生产力提升?

印度企业界的乐观情绪站得住脚吗?

印度企业界公开表达的乐观情绪,与家庭和投资者的焦虑情绪之间的落差日益明显。

Lex专栏:中国药企在药品开发领域获得一席之地

外国制药集团如今开始购买中国本土开发创新药物的授权。

特斯拉与太空探索技术公司:以马斯克为中心的庞大企业星系

埃隆•马斯克旗下上市公司的合并有一定道理,但其他股东最终可能不如现在有影响力。

火箭、机器人和风险:马斯克的3.6万亿美元豪赌

全球首富试图促成迄今最大胆的一笔合并交易,但他还需要说服股东和全球监管机构。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×